Belonging is everything. Feeling safe, not having to mask aspects of yourself that could put you in danger in certain surroundings. Not having to explain yourself. Community.
Our belonging means, to me, our belonging to one global human race. This exhibition brought me to consider the benefits of living in our own cultural space, learning to be content with what we have and not imposing ourselves on the territory & cultural space of others. It may be a recipe for slower human development but it is also a recipe for a more peaceful and diverse world.
Belonging means the complexities of calling someone, something, somewhere home. So, what does home mean to me? And how could I ever live peacefully if I know the most dearest people (but also everybody else) cannot call a place home, not because they cannot answer this question for themselves but because others take it away before the possibility of this community arises.
Justice, albeit belonging, doesn’t sound like enough. To me, belonging means to be a part, but not necessarily knowledge being taught about history and injustices committed. I sincerely hope that Switzerland will be a place where people of all cultures and backgrounds experience equity and being seen, but fear that there is still a long way to go. This exhibition, as well as others I have visited, were a true eye-opener in the sense that people and cultures were not simply being talked about, but shown & shared by members of said cultures, and to do so, and to then create a space of belonging for the ones who have always had the privilege of belonging, we have to listen, learn & do better. You truly did an amazing job. I commend your work, amazing!
In response to multiple visitor requests for access to the full transcript of the workshop, we propose a different approach: acoustic fragments. Providing the full 50-page transcript of the workshop would not only be impractical and likely go unread but would also undermine its performative and experiential essence. Rather than offering a fixed, exhaustive document, we acknowledge that the interpretation of our input is deeply tied to our lived experience, shaped by evolving perspectives on race, identity, and belonging. The full transcript risks flattening, misrepresenting or oversimplifying these complexities, reducing rich, dynamic discussions to static words rather than ongoing, fluid dialogue.
Our intention is not to make these conversations digestible but rather accessible—offering an entry point that invites reflection, curiosity, and engagement with the layers of meaning beyond words alone. Unlike a written record, sound carries nuances and encourages a more immersive encounter. Rather than passively reading, visitors are prompted to pause, listen, and reflect. The act of listening becomes part of the experience, aligning with the fragmentary nature of the text and the themes of presence and belonging at the core of our contribution.
Each listener can choose to engage in their own way—whether by keeping their eyes open, absorbing the surrounding space, or closing them to focus purely on the voices, tones, and silences. These fragments embrace incompleteness. Each stands alone while simultaneously gesturing toward a larger whole—one that remains elusive, shifting with each listener’s perception.
It is not what is spoken that speaks, but what is heard. It is not the sound that matters, but the echo within us!